Sample report. Create a free account to see your own Writing breakdown.

Create account
Analysis Report · Writing

Writing Performance Analysis

Synthesised from 34 graded responses across 2 task types. Scores calibrated to official CELPIP rater bands.

Window
Mar 20, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026
Responses
34 analysed
Target
CLB 9
Overall band
9CLB
on the 1–12 CELPIP scale Steady
01 / 05

Executive summary

The verdict, drawn from your scored writing history and rater-aligned dimension models.

You are consistently producing clear, well‑structured emails and survey responses that show strong organization and appropriate tone. Your writing shows a solid grasp of the format and a natural use of everyday language, which keeps your responses engaging and easy to read.

The biggest area holding you back is Transitions & Reference (linking your ideas so they flow). In real‑life writing, weak transitions make it hard for readers to follow your argument, and this keeps your overall score below the Level 10 threshold. Strengthening your linking sentences will bring you closer to the target.

02 / 05

Scoring dimensions

Your profile across the four areas official CELPIP raters score in Writing.

11.1Task Fulfillment

Did you follow the task instructions fully and use the right tone?

9.0Vocabulary

Did you use precise and natural words for the situation?

8.7Readability

Was your writing easy to read and understand?

8.4Content/Coherenceneeds work

Were your ideas clear, organised, and well supported?

Skill breakdown by CELPIP scoring area

These are the 4 official areas CELPIP raters actually score you on — the same criteria used on your real test. Each area breaks into smaller skills so you can see exactly what's helping or hurting your score. Tap the on any skill for a practical next step.

Each skill has a coloured bar showing how strong it is. Here's what the colours mean:

Weakest hereDevelopingStrongerFocusWork on first
Content/Coherence8.3 / 12
Transitions & Reference focus7.8

Assesses how clearly linking words and references connect ideas.

Idea Development 8.0

Evaluates how fully you explain and support points with reasons, examples, or details.

Paragraph Cohesion 8.1

Checks whether each chunk holds one clear idea and the sentences fit together.

Global Organization 9.3

Assesses whether your response has a clear beginning, middle, and end in a logical order.

Readability8.9 / 12
Sentence Control & Variety focus8.5

Assesses whether your sentences are both well controlled and varied in structure.

Local Fluency 8.8

Checks whether each sentence reads smoothly without awkward phrasing.

Mechanics 9.1

Evaluates spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.

Grammar Accuracy 9.2

Checks whether grammar mistakes stay rare and do not block your meaning.

Vocabulary9.0 / 12
Lexical Range focus8.7

Checks whether you use varied words and expressions instead of repeating basic vocabulary.

Collocations & Idiomaticity 8.7

Checks whether word pairings and phrases sound natural.

Lexical Precision 8.8

Assesses how specific and accurate your word choices are.

Register Appropriateness 9.9

Evaluates whether word choice matches the task formality and audience.

Task Fulfillment11.3 / 12
Format & Conventions focus10.5

Checks whether your response follows the expected structure and suitable length.

Coverage 11.4

Checks whether your response fully addresses all parts of the task prompt.

Purpose & Audience 11.6

Assesses how clearly your goal is communicated and whether you are speaking to the right audience.

Tone 11.6

Evaluates whether politeness and formality match the situation and relationship.

03 / 05

Writing quality signals

Simple checks that show whether your writing is complete, clear, and easy to follow.

Response length
167 words
Sometimes too short
This checks whether your responses are usually long enough to fully answer the task.
Following the task
10.5 / 12
Task format needs attention
This shows where you lose marks most often for task format, tone, or answering the prompt clearly.
Ease of reading
8.5 / 12
Some sentences are hard to follow
This shows what most often makes your writing harder to read, such as grammar, sentence structure, or punctuation.
Most repeated problem
Readability
About 4 issues per response
This is the type of problem that appears most often in your writing feedback.
04 / 05

Consistency across task types

Compare your average scores in Email and Survey Response to see whether one task type needs more attention.

Stronger task
Survey Response · 9.7
This is your higher-scoring writing task right now.
Needs more practice
Email · 9.1
This task type is more likely to hold your score back right now.
Task gap
About 0.6 level
A smaller gap means your Email and Survey scores are more balanced.
05 / 05

Priority actions

Ranked by impact toward your CLB 9 target. Tailored to your practice history.

01

Practice linking ideas in emails

Focus on adding clear linking words and sentences that connect each paragraph. Use the email practice task to write 5 emails, paying special attention to transitions. This will raise your Transitions & Reference score from 7.8 toward the target.

02

Improve transitions in survey responses

Write 5 survey replies, deliberately using connectors like 'firstly', 'however', and 'therefore' to guide the reader. The survey practice task will help you strengthen transitions, which is the main blocker.

03

Use a template to structure paragraphs

Apply the provided writing template to outline each response before writing. This will help you organize ideas and add smoother transitions.

Analysis is based on your practice history and rater-aligned models. It is not a guarantee of your test-day score.
Practice Writing

How your CELPIP Writing level is worked out

Writing has no answer key, so it is judged rather than counted. Your response is rated on the four criteria CELPIP publishes, and your report gives you a level on each one instead of a single mark you cannot unpack.

The four are Task Fulfillment, which asks whether you followed the instructions and used the right tone; Content and Coherence, which asks how well your ideas are organised and developed; Vocabulary, which asks about your range and whether you use it naturally; and Readability, which asks how easy your writing is to follow.

They move independently, and that is the thing worth knowing. A response can be well organised and still lose marks because it missed one part of the question, or cover every point in language that reads awkwardly. Your report quotes the wording that cost you marks from your own answer and shows a corrected version beside it, so you can see the fix and not only the verdict.

Questions about Writing progress

Who or what is marking my Writing?

Our evaluator reads your response and rates it against the same four published criteria a CELPIP rater uses. It is an opinion, as any rating of writing is, and it is applied the same way to every response so the comparison over time is fair.

Why is one of my four dimensions much lower than the rest?

Usually because it is a habit rather than a gap in your English. Missing a required point, or writing an email in the wrong register, shows up on one criterion while the other three stay where they were. That makes it a quick fix once you can see it.

Does the report show what I actually wrote?

Yes. Your answer is kept with the report, with the specific phrases that lost marks quoted from it. Reading the corrected version beside your own wording is where most of the learning happens.

Where to go next

Sign up free