Sample report. Create a free account to see your own Reading breakdown.
Create accountReading Performance Analysis
Synthesised from 90 scored attempts across 4 reading parts. Analysis follows official CELPIP Reading question types and timing targets.
Executive summary
The verdict, drawn from your pooled Reading practice data and official CELPIP Reading structure.
You’re already a pro at turning visual data into clear answers. In the diagram‑reading part you consistently answer correctly and finish quickly, giving you a solid foundation for the rest of the test. Your overall accuracy sits around 75%, showing you’re on the right track.
The biggest hurdle is the viewpoint section, where you’re only getting 64% right. That means you often miss subtle cues about the writer’s attitude or how different opinions compare, which can throw off your overall score. To reach the next level, you’ll need to boost this part so it matches the 10‑level goal.
Question-type profile
These percentages show which question types you answer correctly most often, and which ones need more practice.
General Meaning questions ask for the main idea or big picture. To answer them better, focus on what the whole paragraph or passage is mostly about, not just one small detail.
Specific Information questions ask for one exact detail from the text or audio. To answer them better, look for names, numbers, dates, places, or clearly stated facts.
Inference questions ask what the text suggests without saying it directly. To answer them better, look for clues in the tone, details, and overall meaning before choosing your answer.
Accuracy & pace signals
Simple checks that show where you are losing marks and whether timing is making the part harder.
Consistency across reading parts
Compare your average scores across the Reading parts to see which ones are stronger and which need more practice.
Priority actions
Ranked by impact toward your CLB 9 target. Tailored to your practice history.
Focus on Reading for Viewpoints
Your accuracy on Task 4: Reading for Viewpoints is only 64%, below the 78% target. Practice spotting writer attitudes and comparing opinions in short texts. Use the official Task 4 practice to improve speed to the 13‑minute target.
Sharpen Inference Skills
Inference questions are your weakest type at 69%. Work on reading between the lines in viewpoint passages. Use the Task 4 practice to target inference clues.
Maintain Diagram Reading Strength
Task 2 is strong at 90% and fast (average 330s vs 540s target). Keep practicing to stay consistent.
How your CELPIP Reading level is worked out
Reading is counted, not judged. Every question has one right answer, so your Reading level comes straight from how many you got right. There is no opinion in it.
Which ones you missed is the useful part, so the report groups them by question type. CELPIP asks three kinds of question here: General Meaning, which wants the main idea; Specific Information, which wants one detail that is actually stated; and Inference, which asks what the passage suggests without saying it outright.
Those three need different habits. Skimming for the gist is a different skill from scanning for a name or a date, and both are different from weighing what a writer implies. Most people are clearly weaker at one of the three, and the report names which one is yours rather than leaving you to do more mixed practice and hope.
Questions about Reading progress
Why does my Reading report show question types instead of a band breakdown?
Because Reading has right answers. A band breakdown is for work someone has to judge, and there is nothing to judge here. Accuracy by question type tells you the thing you can act on: which kind of question you keep getting wrong.
What does my weakest question type actually tell me?
Where the fastest marks are. If you are strong on stated details and weak on inference, more general reading practice will not fix it, but working specifically on what a passage implies will.
How much Reading practice before the estimate means anything?
Enough that one lucky or unlucky passage stops moving it. Early on the number jumps around, and it settles as you add attempts across different parts rather than repeating the same one.